Alessandro Spadola vs Erwin Troebinger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Spadola vs E. Troebinger

Alessandro Spadola
ITA
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
29
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Erwin Troebinger
ITA
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
29
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Spadola 1 - 0 Troebinger
They have played 3 sets in total, with Alessandro Spadola winning 2 and Erwin Troebinger winning 1. The last match between Alessandro Spadola and Erwin Troebinger was at the M25 Trento, 16-02-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Alessandro Spadola getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-2 10-7.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Spadola | 1 |
| Troebinger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M25 Trento(02-16-25)
Alessandro Spadola
6
6
10
Erwin Troebinger
7
2
7
A. Spadola vs E. Troebinger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.17% (65-55) | Career Total W/L | 19.71% (27-110) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Spadola vs E. Troebinger Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In their most recent performance over the past six months, Spadola has exhibited an impressive proficiency, winning 47.02% of points on their second serve. On the other hand, Troebinger has achieved a slightly lower success rate at 41.33%. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game stats recent form: Analyzing the return game statistics in their recent performances, Spadola has demonstrated exceptional prowess. Within their recent form, they have successfully won 53.43% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Troebinger has recorded a relatively lower figure of 41.07% in the same category. Furthermore, Spadola has exhibited superior performance in first serve returns, with a success rate of 40.2%, compared to Troebinger's 22.37%. These statistics serve as valuable indicators when determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup, and possess a strong correlation with accurate predictions.
- Under pressure analysis: When subjected to intense pressure and pivotal moments, it is essential to evaluate a player's ability to save breakpoints. Spadola has meticulously saved 57.02% of these critical moments in recent matches, displaying composure and resilience. Conversely, Troebinger has managed to save an impressive 69.57% of breakpoints. This vital statistic proves to be highly useful for making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Assessing their performance over the course of the past year, Spadola has emerged as the more triumphant player. They have triumphed in 60% of the matches they participated in, with an impressive win-loss record of 24 wins and 16 losses. Conversely, Troebinger's performance has been less stellar, winning only 16% of matches, with a win-loss record of 4 victories and 21 defeats. These performance records provide an overview and insight into the head-to-head prediction.
- Best surface: Over their careers, Spadola has displayed exceptional proficiency on hard surfaces, attaining a remarkable win rate of 59% (W/L 20/14). In contrast, they have struggled on indoor hard surfaces, achieving a meager win rate of 0% (W/L 0/3). Troebinger, on the other hand, excels on clay courts, securing victories in 20% of matches (W/L 13/52). However, their performance on hard surfaces has been less impressive, with a win rate of 18% (W/L 4/18). These surface-specific records are noteworthy when considering the outcome of the match.
- Player level: In the past year, Spadola has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10K. During these tournaments, they have exhibited exceptional skills, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/15). Conversely, Troebinger has also primarily participated in similar tournaments, achieving success in only 16% of matches (W/L 4/21). When comparing statistical data between the players, it is crucial to note that their level of competition greatly influences their performance and favoritism.
- Opponent quality stats: Examining their performances against various opponents in the past 12 months, Spadola's average opponent rank stood at an impressive 190.22. On the other hand, Troebinger's average opponent rank was slightly higher, at 203.48. This statistic sheds light on the caliber of competition they have faced, providing valuable insights into their overall performance.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is crucial to evaluate a player's performance in deciding sets. Over the past year, Spadola has displayed commendable aptitude in these pivotal moments, emerging victorious in 45% of deciding sets. Similarly, Troebinger has also proved to be resilient, winning 50% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. This statistic demonstrates their ability to handle high-pressure situations, serving as a significant factor in making informed live betting decisions.
- Current event H2H stats: While analyzing the outcome of tennis matches, previous player performances offer valuable foresight. However, it is equally important to consider the current event statistics, as they indicate the form of the players in real-time. For accurate predictions, one must diligently examine the stats in the current event. To access up-to-date information on this matter, please refer to the section below. Additionally, player preferences for specific events should be factored into the equation when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- Break point conversion: Assessing recent form, Spadola has proven their proficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on 49.07% of them. Troebinger, on the other hand, maintains a similar level of expertise, converting 50% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This significant statistic provides valuable insights for in-game live betting, particularly when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess an inclination towards models that predict tennis matches, it is advisable to peruse this article. It serves as an excellent starting point for individuals with a keen interest in statistical analysis and tennis predictions. (Warning: exclusively recommended for stats enthusiasts)
Alessandro Spadola vs Erwin Troebinger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Spadola vs E. Troebinger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 22 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Spadola 48%, Troebinger 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Spadola 50%, Troebinger 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Spadola 51%, Troebinger 56%.
A. Spadola Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 3-6 10-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
E. Troebinger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||

A. Spadola vs E. Troebinger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.17% (65/55) | YTD Win/Loss | 19.71% (27/110) |
| 54.04% (147/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 23.59% (71/230) |
| 52.53% (1403/1268) | Games Win/Loss | 39.42% (1103/1695) |
| 57.14% (20/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.00% (7/21) |
| 55.13% (43/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 17.50% (14/66) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.69% (6/23) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 64 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 146 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 189.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 171.24 |
| 64% (2255/3537) | 1st Serve % | 54% (1332/2465) |
| 59% (1339/2255) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (839/1332) |
| 46% (595/1282) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (488/1133) |
| 48% (176/367) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (55/152) |
| 42% (1452/3421) | Return Points Win % | 34% (774/2284) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 56.52% (65/50) | Futures W/L | 19.38% (25/104) |
| 53% (63/118) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 20% (27/137) |
| 50% (11/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 27% (7/26) |
| 44% (15/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 89% (63/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 68% (34/23) |
| 11% (63/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 32% (34/11) |
| 16% (57/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (103/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 21 Dec, 08:00 PM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 02:00 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Alexander Blockx
Mio Mushika
Tahlia Kokkinis
Sohyun Park
Ksenia Efremova
Soha Sadiq
Chandana PotugariSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
20:00
H2H 0-0
01:00
H2H 0-0
08:30
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0